{蜂蜜公爵}

我庄严宣誓我不干好事

The Fringe Benefits of Failure, and the Importance of Imagination

Copyright June 2008

As prepared for delivery

President Faust, members of the Harvard Corporation and the Board of Overseers, members of the faculty, proud parents, and, above all, graduates,

The first thing I would like to say is 'thank you.' Not only has Harvard given me an extraordinary honour, but the weeks of fear and nausea I've experienced at the thought of giving this commencement address have made me lose weight. A win-win situation! Now all I have to do is take deep breaths, squint at the red banners and fool myself into believing I am at the world's best-educated Harry Potter convention.

Delivering a commencement address is a great responsibility; or so I thought until I cast my mind back to my own graduation. The commencement speaker that day was the distinguished British philosopher Baroness Mary Warnock. Reflecting on her speech has helped me enormously in writing this one, because it turns out that I can't remember a single word she said. This liberating discovery enables me to proceed without any fear that I might inadvertently influence you to abandon promising careers in business, law or politics for the giddy delights of becoming a gay wizard.

You see? If all you remember in years to come is the 'gay wizard' joke, I've still come out ahead of Baroness Mary Warnock. Achievable goals: the first step towards personal improvement.

Actually, I have wracked my mind and heart for what I ought to say to you today. I have asked myself what I wish I had known at my own graduation, and what important lessons I have learned in the 21 years that has expired between that day and this.

I have come up with two answers. On this wonderful day when we are gathered together to celebrate your academic success, I have decided to talk to you about the benefits of failure. And as you stand on the threshold of what is sometimes called 'real life', I want to extol the crucial importance of imagination.

These might seem quixotic or paradoxical choices, but please bear with me.

Looking back at the 21-year-old that I was at graduation, is a slightly uncomfortable experience for the 42-year-old that she has become. Half my lifetime ago, I was striking an uneasy balance between the ambition I had for myself, and what those closest to me expected of me.

I was convinced that the only thing I wanted to do, ever, was to write novels. However, my parents, both of whom came from impoverished backgrounds and neither of whom had been to college, took the view that my overactive imagination was an amusing personal quirk that could never pay a mortgage, or secure a pension.

They had hoped that I would take a vocational degree; I wanted to study English Literature. A compromise was reached that in retrospect satisfied nobody, and I went up to study Modern Languages. Hardly had my parents' car rounded the corner at the end of the road than I ditched German and scuttled off down the Classics corridor.

I cannot remember telling my parents that I was studying Classics; they might well have found out for the first time on graduation day. Of all subjects on this planet, I think they would have been hard put to name one less useful than Greek mythology when it came to securing the keys to an executive bathroom.

I would like to make it clear, in parenthesis, that I do not blame my parents for their point of view. There is an expiry date on blaming your parents for steering you in the wrong direction; the moment you are old enough to take the wheel, responsibility lies with you. What is more, I cannot criticise my parents for hoping that I would never experience poverty. They had been poor themselves, and I have since been poor, and I quite agree with them that it is not an ennobling experience. Poverty entails fear, and stress, and sometimes depression; it means a thousand petty humiliations and hardships. Climbing out of poverty by your own efforts, that is indeed something on which to pride yourself, but poverty itself is romanticised only by fools.

What I feared most for myself at your age was not poverty, but failure.

At your age, in spite of a distinct lack of motivation at university, where I had spent far too long in the coffee bar writing stories, and far too little time at lectures, I had a knack for passing examinations, and that, for years, had been the measure of success in my life and that of my peers.

I am not dull enough to suppose that because you are young, gifted and well-educated, you have never known hardship or heartbreak. Talent and intelligence never yet inoculated anyone against the caprice of the Fates, and I do not for a moment suppose that everyone here has enjoyed an existence of unruffled privilege and contentment.

However, the fact that you are graduating from Harvard suggests that you are not very well-acquainted with failure. You might be driven by a fear of failure quite as much as a desire for success. Indeed, your conception of failure might not be too far from the average person's idea of success, so high have you already flown academically.

Ultimately, we all have to decide for ourselves what constitutes failure, but the world is quite eager to give you a set of criteria if you let it. So I think it fair to say that by any conventional measure, a mere seven years after my graduation day, I had failed on an epic scale. An exceptionally short-lived marriage had imploded, and I was jobless, a lone parent, and as poor as it is possible to be in modern Britain, without being homeless. The fears my parents had had for me, and that I had had for myself, had both come to pass, and by every usual standard, I was the biggest failure I knew.

Now, I am not going to stand here and tell you that failure is fun. That period of my life was a dark one, and I had no idea that there was going to be what the press has since represented as a kind of fairy tale resolution. I had no idea how far the tunnel extended, and for a long time, any light at the end of it was a hope rather than a reality.

So why do I talk about the benefits of failure? Simply because failure meant a stripping away of the inessential. I stopped pretending to myself that I was anything other than what I was, and began to direct all my energy into finishing the only work that mattered to me. Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged. I was set free, because my greatest fear had already been realised, and I was still alive, and I still had a daughter whom I adored, and I had an old typewriter and a big idea. And so rock bottom became the solid foundation on which I rebuilt my life.

You might never fail on the scale I did, but some failure in life is inevitable. It is impossible to live without failing at something, unless you live so cautiously that you might as well not have lived at all – in which case, you fail by default.

Failure gave me an inner security that I had never attained by passing examinations. Failure taught me things about myself that I could have learned no other way. I discovered that I had a strong will, and more discipline than I had suspected; I also found out that I had friends whose value was truly above rubies.

The knowledge that you have emerged wiser and stronger from setbacks means that you are, ever after, secure in your ability to survive. You will never truly know yourself, or the strength of your relationships, until both have been tested by adversity. Such knowledge is a true gift, for all that it is painfully won, and it has been worth more to me than any qualification I ever earned.

Given a time machine or a Time Turner, I would tell my 21-year-old self that personal happiness lies in knowing that life is not a check-list of acquisition or achievement. Your qualifications, your CV, are not your life, though you will meet many people of my age and older who confuse the two. Life is difficult, and complicated, and beyond anyone's total control, and the humility to know that will enable you to survive its vicissitudes.

You might think that I chose my second theme, the importance of imagination, because of the part it played in rebuilding my life, but that is not wholly so. Though I will defend the value of bedtime stories to my last gasp, I have learned to value imagination in a much broader sense. Imagination is not only the uniquely human capacity to envision that which is not, and therefore the fount of all invention and innovation. In its arguably most transformative and revelatory capacity, it is the power that enables us to empathise with humans whose experiences we have never shared.

One of the greatest formative experiences of my life preceded Harry Potter, though it informed much of what I subsequently wrote in those books. This revelation came in the form of one of my earliest day jobs. Though I was sloping off to write stories during my lunch hours, I paid the rent in my early 20s by working in the research department at Amnesty International's headquarters in London.

There in my little office I read hastily scribbled letters smuggled out of totalitarian regimes by men and women who were risking imprisonment to inform the outside world of what was happening to them. I saw photographs of those who had disappeared without trace, sent to Amnesty by their desperate families and friends. I read the testimony of torture victims and saw pictures of their injuries. I opened handwritten, eye-witness accounts of summary trials and executions, of kidnappings and rapes.

Many of my co-workers were ex-political prisoners, people who had been displaced from their homes, or fled into exile, because they had the temerity to think independently of their government. Visitors to our office included those who had come to give information, or to try and find out what had happened to those they had been forced to leave behind.

I shall never forget the African torture victim, a young man no older than I was at the time, who had become mentally ill after all he had endured in his homeland. He trembled uncontrollably as he spoke into a video camera about the brutality inflicted upon him. He was a foot taller than I was, and seemed as fragile as a child. I was given the job of escorting him to the Underground Station afterwards, and this man whose life had been shattered by cruelty took my hand with exquisite courtesy, and wished me future happiness.

And as long as I live I shall remember walking along an empty corridor and suddenly hearing, from behind a closed door, a scream of pain and horror such as I have never heard since. The door opened, and the researcher poked out her head and told me to run and make a hot drink for the young man sitting with her. She had just given him the news that in retaliation for his own outspokenness against his country's regime, his mother had been seized and executed.

Every day of my working week in my early 20s I was reminded how incredibly fortunate I was, to live in a country with a democratically elected government, where legal representation and a public trial were the rights of everyone.

Every day, I saw more evidence about the evils humankind will inflict on their fellow humans, to gain or maintain power. I began to have nightmares, literal nightmares, about some of the things I saw, heard and read.

And yet I also learned more about human goodness at Amnesty International than I had ever known before.

Amnesty mobilises thousands of people who have never been tortured or imprisoned for their beliefs to act on behalf of those who have. The power of human empathy, leading to collective action, saves lives, and frees prisoners. Ordinary people, whose personal well-being and security are assured, join together in huge numbers to save people they do not know, and will never meet. My small participation in that process was one of the most humbling and inspiring experiences of my life.

Unlike any other creature on this planet, humans can learn and understand, without having experienced. They can think themselves into other people's minds, imagine themselves into other people's places.

Of course, this is a power, like my brand of fictional magic, that is morally neutral. One might use such an ability to manipulate, or control, just as much as to understand or sympathise.

And many prefer not to exercise their imaginations at all. They choose to remain comfortably within the bounds of their own experience, never troubling to wonder how it would feel to have been born other than they are. They can refuse to hear screams or to peer inside cages; they can close their minds and hearts to any suffering that does not touch them personally; they can refuse to know.

I might be tempted to envy people who can live that way, except that I do not think they have any fewer nightmares than I do. Choosing to live in narrow spaces can lead to a form of mental agoraphobia, and that brings its own terrors. I think the wilfully unimaginative see more monsters. They are often more afraid.

What is more, those who choose not to empathise may enable real monsters. For without ever committing an act of outright evil ourselves, we collude with it, through our own apathy.

One of the many things I learned at the end of that Classics corridor down which I ventured at the age of 18, in search of something I could not then define, was this, written by the Greek author Plutarch: What we achieve inwardly will change outer reality.

That is an astonishing statement and yet proven a thousand times every day of our lives. It expresses, in part, our inescapable connection with the outside world, the fact that we touch other people's lives simply by existing.

But how much more are you, Harvard graduates of 2008, likely to touch other people's lives? Your intelligence, your capacity for hard work, the education you have earned and received, give you unique status, and unique responsibilities. Even your nationality sets you apart. The great majority of you belong to the world's only remaining superpower. The way you vote, the way you live, the way you protest, the pressure you bring to bear on your government, has an impact way beyond your borders. That is your privilege, and your burden.

If you choose to use your status and influence to raise your voice on behalf of those who have no voice; if you choose to identify not only with the powerful, but with the powerless; if you retain the ability to imagine yourself into the lives of those who do not have your advantages, then it will not only be your proud families who celebrate your existence, but thousands and millions of people whose reality you have helped transform for the better. We do not need magic to change the world, we carry all the power we need inside ourselves already: we have the power to imagine better.

I am nearly finished. I have one last hope for you, which is something that I already had at 21. The friends with whom I sat on graduation day have been my friends for life. They are my children's godparents, the people to whom I've been able to turn in times of trouble, friends who have been kind enough not to sue me when I've used their names for Death Eaters. At our graduation we were bound by enormous affection, by our shared experience of a time that could never come again, and, of course, by the knowledge that we held certain photographic evidence that would be exceptionally valuable if any of us ran for Prime Minister.

So today, I can wish you nothing better than similar friendships. And tomorrow, I hope that even if you remember not a single word of mine, you remember those of Seneca, another of those old Romans I met when I fled down the Classics corridor, in retreat from career ladders, in search of ancient wisdom:

As is a tale, so is life: not how long it is, but how good it is, is what matters.

I wish you all very good lives.

Thank you very much.

马上就是暑假了...今天趁着没事做到图书馆里借了几本书
在文学库逛的时候,想了很多
发现以前最喜欢法国和英国的书
现在看到
却是一点兴趣也无
反倒是以前敬而远之的俄国小说
越来越引起我的兴趣
好像是突然之间有了这个转变
自己都觉得很神奇
那些情节比较曲折的书
比如《基督山伯爵》
现在我是连碰都不想再碰
看了就觉得腻烦
在文学库转了一大圈,最后人家要下班了
拿到手的只有两本:
陀思妥耶夫斯基的《白痴》和《罪与罚》
其实还想借阅《等待戈多》、《日瓦戈医生》和茨威格的书
可惜《等待戈多》在旅游系,《日瓦戈医生》,还是先看电影再看书罢
茨威格的书标题太骇人,《茨威格欲望小说》(类似,不记得了)
带回家去
我老娘会操刀砍了我
于是放弃。
最想看的书其实是《追忆似水年华》
主要是受高一语文老师的影响
教过我的最有才华的老师
强力推荐的书
什么时候一定要去看看
看了《了不起的盖茨比》之后
我后悔了好久
这么好的书
居然到了大一寒假才看到
相见恨晚
从此改变了对美国小说的看法
但是在文学库
似乎没看到什么菲茨杰拉德的书
失望
四年前读《约翰·克利斯朵夫》,还没读完就还了
到现在心里还记挂着
但是那书太厚
还是开学再借着看
所以,最后借了八本书
《爱因斯坦:相对论一百年》(传记)
《时间简史》、《果壳中的宇宙》
《进化中的宇宙》
《丰子恺散文》、《丰子恺游记》
《白痴》、《罪与罚》
《罪与罚》借过一次,还没看完,后来超期了
当时一起借的还有《洛丽塔》和《贞德传》
都没有看完
对于《洛丽塔》,我只能说
我对这本书感到很茫然
因为不论看什么书
我总能直觉地感觉出我抱着什么目的来看能够得到什么
可是这本书不行
所以我直接放弃不看
丰子恺先生的散文是我很喜欢的
如果没有读过
推荐他的《渐》

2008/6/30

亲爱的LMC~

真是个引人遐想的标题...
不过我不担心
XD咱俩什么关系吖对吧sugar~
你对我没兴趣我也对你没兴趣
算得上知根知底的了
你看我多自觉
把你的博客加了链接没事去逛逛
你这个没良心的
哼哼
还有我本来准备你回来之后去你家蹭一顿饭的
顺便看看他
结果他居然不来
你真是
太让我失望了
所以
为了赔偿我
你一定要把《偷书贼》带回来借我看
不然
我就往你家空投炸尾螺XDDD
还要在你衣柜里塞满鼻涕虫
屈服在我的淫威之下吧
哦活活活~
s




今天在看量子宇宙论的一些东西。

发现物理真是个好东西~
从小到大一直想知道宇宙是否存在边界,到哪里才算边界,边界之外又是什么...
很满意霍金的观点:
宇宙有限而无界,只不过比地球多了几维。比如,我们的地球就是有限而无界的。在地球上,无论从南极走到北极,还是从北极走到南极,你始终不可能找到地球的边界,但你不能由此认为地球是无限的。实际上,我们都知道地球是有限的。地球如此,宇宙亦是如此 
那个界线,也许要看宇宙的膨胀程度,如果三维空间的曲率是正的,宇宙有限无边,它会不断地重复“爆炸-膨胀-收缩-爆炸”的循环,那么宇宙的体积也就是有限的。三维空间曲率为零和为负的情况很相似,宇宙会永远膨胀,但是温度、密度和曲率都会逐渐下降,这两种情况下的宇宙都是无边无界的...

当一个物体接近光速时,它的质量上升得越来越快,它需要越来越多的能量才能进一步加速上去。实际上它永远不可能达到光速,因为那时质量会变成无限大,而由质量能量等价原理,这就需要无限大的能量才能做到。由于这个原因,相对论限制任何正常的物体永远以低于光速的速度运动。只有光或其他没有内禀质量的波才能以光速运动。”
照这种说法,我们想要逃离太阳系都是不可能的...就算可能,我也不可能在有生之年看到了...先要有理论,理论之后是实验,实验证实理论以后,还要N久的研究...那个时候,说不定太阳都已经变成白矮星我们地球早就在太阳膨胀时给吞了...
还有虫洞的理论,首先,虫洞的引力太大,会毁灭所有进入它的东西,用来进行时空旅行是不可能的;再就是,虫洞维持的时间很短,就算宇宙飞船进去了不会被毁灭,它也不能在虫洞断开之前穿越...这么说,时空旅行也是不可能的了...
怎么这科学只能告诉我什么都不可能呢...
失望中...

但是我还是热爱天文学...
我一定要学好量子宇宙论!!!


国籍:瑞士


生日:1981年8月8日

星座:狮子座

出生地:瑞士巴塞尔(Basel)

居住地:瑞士奥伯韦尔(Oberwil)

身高:185厘米

体重:88千克

转职业年:1998年

持拍:右手握拍,单手反拍

奖金:40,979,981(至2008/06/16)

球拍:Wilson(K)Factor(K)Six-One Tour90

球衣/球鞋:Nike(亦赞助商)

大满贯战绩:


澳网:冠军(2004,2006,2007)

法网:亚军(2006,2007,2008)

温网:冠军(2003,2004,2005,2006,2007)

美网:冠军(2004,2005,2006,2007)

大师杯:冠军(2003,2004,2006,2007);亚军(2005)



       Roger的头衔太多,连他自己都说,不敢相信自己曾经50次亲吻冠军奖杯(现在是55个XD)。他似乎总是与天才、伟大、奇迹等词语联系在一起,那么多赞么的词汇,差点都让我忘了当初为他着迷的原因。
      看网球是从一次小威的比赛开始的,对手是刚成名的莎拉波娃。那时只是因为莎娃长得漂亮而已(我一直耽于皮相啊……什么都看卖相),并不是很认真的在看,甚至连比赛规则都不是很懂。后来倒也看出点意思,也就开始看网球了。然后,某天开始看男单(以前懒得麻烦只看女单),很抱歉,是为的看罗迪克(还是因为皮相……尽情地鄙视我吧……),看了几场之后,我却发现,自己的注意力慢慢转到一个叫Roger Federer的球手身上去了。不是因为解说员对于他的赞美,不是因为他惊人的连胜,不是因为他积分世界第一,而是因为他的优雅。每一个动作都精确而舒展,对比其他球手救球、挥拍时的狰狞表情,Roger总是优雅而从容,动作像体操一样赏心悦目,表情也是淡淡的,可是,却总能让人明确感觉到,是他在掌控着这场比赛,即使是他处于下风之时,我也很少担心,因为,仿佛信仰一般,我总是相信这个沉稳的王者能在任何时刻将局势扭转,只要他愿意,便能翻手为云覆手为雨。不是说他赢得轻松,相反,他在一直不断地努力达到一个更高的水平,四处参加比赛,又是甚至带伤上场。他也有过低迷时期,也有一个强劲的对手(纳达尔),还有那从未圆过的罗兰加洛斯之梦。但是,他的从容他的沉稳他的优雅他的气度,总是能让人不自觉地相信,他能够赢得任何一场比赛,而事实也确实如此。
      Roger的冠军头衔我不想去数,我也不记得他到底已经蝉联多久的世界第一,还有那些连胜纪录……要数便数去吧,历史才会记录这些,还有博格还有桑普拉斯还有阿加西还有那么多在我们出生之前的网球天才们,尽管去数吧,历史记录数字,而活着的人,只会铭记传奇!
      他是网球史上最优秀最有天赋的球手之一,他是属于这个时代的王者,他是我们这个时代的传奇,那些曾经称霸网坛的前辈们,比如博格都不得不承认这一点:“费德勒打出了不可思议的网球比赛,他看上去毫无瑕疵。”而曾经的对手,现在已经退出网坛的阿加西也说:“我唯一知道的事费德勒之所以能够称霸网坛,是因为他是我见过的最好的球员,而不是因为别人不够好。如果你在说技术,我想网球是在进步。”
     Roger的确在推动着网球的进步,就像小威这样的球员在推动曾经“花拳绣腿”的女子网坛的进步一样,他用他均衡的技术(当然不是完美的,但是相对其他选手,他的技术相当均衡)、谦逊的态度、超凡的人品,改变了网球,也用他的个人魅力是网球更加普及。他的打法和技术被杂志和网球教练们当作教科书来示范学员;他谦逊亲和的热爱度是他受到所有人的喜爱;他对于所有人的尊重使他的品格更受赞赏(听听07年澳网之后博格是怎样对媒体赞扬他的吧);他对于公益活动和爱心慈善的热心更是让人敬重。就单凭他愿意为过出征奥运会这一点,就已经很令人钦佩了。奥运会这汇总吃力不讨好的活儿——没积分(北京奥运会开始有积分了)、奖金少,还经常爆冷门——很多大牌球星是避而远之,Roger却从悉尼奥运会开始没缺席过任何一次。所以,他才能前无古人地连续四年得到“劳伦斯最佳男运动员”的称号。
    他是一个完美的楷模,不管是球技上、品格上还是事业上。记得Roger说过他祖母给他讲过的一句话:It is nice to be important, but it is more important to be nice。他也曾经脾气急躁,会咒骂会摔拍,但是现在他确实网坛有名的谦谦君子,不管是风度还是气量,与从前都不可同日而语。所以,人真的不是完美的,但是Roger一直尝试做到完美,既然性格上他可以改正,相信球技上他也可以臻于完美。
    法网Roger的状态很不好,想想心里挺难受的。他得到过那么多大满贯,为什么就一直不能在罗兰加洛斯圆梦?想起来都好笑,我曾经在高考之前夜不能寐,不是因为学习不是因为高考,而是紧张Roger的法网征战。那个时候妈妈都要气死了,整天不学习,日里夜里守着电视看网球比赛……现在依然期盼着,但是我不着急,因为现在Roger是最伟大的球员,因为Roger说,他最少达到2012年,我们还有时间,Roger还有时间。
      我优雅的王者,我期待着你在罗兰加洛斯的最后加冕。